Q&A: Does anyone else think that the stimulus package should be given to the people, not through “programs”?

Question by Loving Mommy: Does anyone else think that the stimulus package should be given to the people, not through “programs”?
I just read an article that said 1 trillion dollars equals out to $ 12,000 per family of four. I feel like that could get a lot of people out of a lot of debt. Some would pay off credit cards (bailing them out), some would buy new cars (bailing out the auto industry- or proving who still “has it”), some would use it as a down payment on a home, or pay towards their mortgage for which they may have fallen behind (mortgage companies and homeowners bailout), and some could even use it to pay off other bills in order to qualify to refinance their home. Isn’t it a win-win situation? I don’t understand why this is not what the government is proposing, and I am looking for some intelligent opinions to make me understand. Thanks!

Best answer:

Answer by Sway
I dont think there should be ANY more stimulus packages

What do you think? Answer below!

Why do conservatives try to blame low income people for the housing crisis?

Question by Davis: Why do conservatives try to blame low income people for the housing crisis?
Right wingers claim that the housing bust was caused by “liberals’ making it too easy for lower income people to buy homes. This of course is a lie but who cares, it sounds good!

The housing crisis was caused by the massive de-regulation of the mortgage industry. Just go to Las Vegas and see the blocks of foreclosed homes that were bought for a half million dollars by people who could only afford a two hundred thousand dollar house. These homes were bought at inflated prices through ARM loans, and interest only loans. They were told the home would go up in value to the point where at the end of three to five years they could either sell the home for a large profit, or else refinance. These were the six figure yuppie types that bought these places, not lower income people.

The government did not “force” banks to loan money to anyone. This is a Limbaughesque lie.

As for Bush seeing the crisis coming and trying to stop it is laughable. I saw a speech on You Tube where Bush is speaking before a group of Realtors in 2002. He says and I quote, “Just because people have lousy credit does not mean they have to live in a lousy home.” He encouraged people with “poor credit to work with Fannie and Freddie.”

Yes, after the roof started caving in the Bush Administration told Congress to do something. If Bush was as on top of this as right wingers claim, why did he never mention it in any of his state of the union speeches?

Mortgage companies are who we ought to blame. They were lending money to people with NO CREDIT checks, and lying about people’s incomes to get them into expensive homes.

The Republican National organization of Realtors were cheering as well.
Lower income people did not get ARM loans and interest only loans, the got standard FHA loans.

When Bush ran for re-election in 2004 he boasted at every campaign stop about all the new and “minority” home ownership.
The Real,
Even Alan Greenspan said that blaming the “Community Reinvestment Act” is nonsense.

low income people did NOT buy homes on anything but standard FHA loans.
White Power,

Bush did not warn anyone until the ship had sailed. Bush ran for re-election in 2004 boasting of all the new home owners. Low income people DID not get loans with balloon payments. Six figure types did.

Turn Rush,and Hannity, off and get real facts.

Why did Bush not ONE TIME mention this impending crisis in any of his State of the Union Speeches?
Warren,

The banks were NOT forced to loan money. They loved the government backed loans because they could make money with little risk.

Bush bragged in 2004 about all the new “minority home owners.” It was part of his “ownership society.”

Best answer:

Answer by Nesquick
It wasn’t low income housing people, it was house flippers and house investers that did it.
Greedy people wanting to make a fast buck buying over priced houses to resell them at a ridiculous profit but then the housing bubble burst and the prices dropped and now they’re stuck with houses they paid way too much for and no way to unload them with out losing tons of money.

What do you think? Answer below!

How MANY people do you THINK AGREE with CNBC’s Rick Santelli’s RIP on what is INHERENTLY WRONG with Obama?

Question by demhater: How MANY people do you THINK AGREE with CNBC’s Rick Santelli’s RIP on what is INHERENTLY WRONG with Obama?
CNBC editor Rick Santelli let it rip on-air Thursday, leading a “mob” of Chicago traders in a mini-revolt against the government’s mortgage bailout plan.

Gesticulating and shouting as cheers and boos erupted, Santelli called foreclosed homeowners “losers” and called for a Revolutionary War-style “tea party.”

“The government is promoting bad behavior,” Santelli said of President Obama’s $ 75 billion initiative to refinance mortgages.

“I have an idea,” he said on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange floor.

“How about this, new President and new administration, why don’t you put up a Web site to have people vote on the Internet … to see if we really want to subsidize the losers’ mortgages.

“Or would we like to at least buy cars and buy houses in foreclosure and give them to people who might have a chance to actually prosper down the road… reward people who could carry the water instead of drink the water.”

Santelli then turned to the traders.

“How many of you people want to pay for your neighbor’s mortgage that has an extra bathroom and can’t pay their bills?” he asked as boos filled the air.

“President Obama,” Santelli continued. “Are you listening?”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THZeE15gWZQ

Best answer:

Answer by Big E
I agree

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!